<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MS09-012: Fixing “Token Kidnapping”</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.c22.cc/2009/04/15/ms09-012-fixing-%e2%80%9ctoken-kidnapping%e2%80%9d/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.c22.cc/2009/04/15/ms09-012-fixing-%e2%80%9ctoken-kidnapping%e2%80%9d/</link>
	<description>Because we&#039;re damned if we do, and we&#039;re damned if we don&#039;t!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 14:56:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ChrisJohnRiley</title>
		<link>http://blog.c22.cc/2009/04/15/ms09-012-fixing-%e2%80%9ctoken-kidnapping%e2%80%9d/comment-page-1/#comment-197</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ChrisJohnRiley]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 06:42:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://c22blog.wordpress.com/?p=468#comment-197</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Things in the initial Microsoft release documents where a little vague on exactly what was fixed. I managed to find some references to the original research  which tends to lean more towards SQL server and IIS issues. In particular they mention the MSDTC service and from the patch information it seems that this is the main area patched. At least 75% of the patched files contain the word DTC. So take it as it comes. I&#039;ll have to find the link and post it as soon as I have the chance.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Things in the initial Microsoft release documents where a little vague on exactly what was fixed. I managed to find some references to the original research  which tends to lean more towards SQL server and IIS issues. In particular they mention the MSDTC service and from the patch information it seems that this is the main area patched. At least 75% of the patched files contain the word DTC. So take it as it comes. I&#8217;ll have to find the link and post it as soon as I have the chance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jcran</title>
		<link>http://blog.c22.cc/2009/04/15/ms09-012-fixing-%e2%80%9ctoken-kidnapping%e2%80%9d/comment-page-1/#comment-196</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jcran]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 05:16:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://c22blog.wordpress.com/?p=468#comment-196</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Chris, great work on this. i hadn&#039;t had a chance to verify this, but i had mixed feelings after seeing the &#039;token kidnapping fixed&#039; advisories. 

My understanding of token kidnapping has changed since the release of MS09-012. I now understand that incognito really just implements token /impersonation/, not token /kidnapping/. As you mentioned, SYSTEM -&gt; arbitrary_user token impersonation is expected behavior. 

I&#039;m not clear on whether the user account option &#039;account is sensitive and cannot be delegated&#039; in Active Directory is of any use in protecting against SYSTEM -&gt; domain user impersonation, or, similarly if the computer account option &#039;Trust computer for delegation&#039; is part of the issue.

The wording here: http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc961980.aspx -- says this:

When you trust a computer for delegation, you enable delegation for all services that run under the Local System account on the computer. If an unwary administrator installs an untrusted service on the computer and configures it to run as Local System, it too can access network resources while impersonating other users. A better practice is to configure services that use delegation to run under their own domain user accounts managed by domain administrators.

Ideas? I think I just need dig a little deeper into the windows security model and understand impersonation better.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris, great work on this. i hadn&#8217;t had a chance to verify this, but i had mixed feelings after seeing the &#8216;token kidnapping fixed&#8217; advisories. </p>
<p>My understanding of token kidnapping has changed since the release of MS09-012. I now understand that incognito really just implements token /impersonation/, not token /kidnapping/. As you mentioned, SYSTEM -&gt; arbitrary_user token impersonation is expected behavior. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m not clear on whether the user account option &#8216;account is sensitive and cannot be delegated&#8217; in Active Directory is of any use in protecting against SYSTEM -&gt; domain user impersonation, or, similarly if the computer account option &#8216;Trust computer for delegation&#8217; is part of the issue.</p>
<p>The wording here: <a href="http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc961980.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc961980.aspx</a> &#8212; says this:</p>
<p>When you trust a computer for delegation, you enable delegation for all services that run under the Local System account on the computer. If an unwary administrator installs an untrusted service on the computer and configures it to run as Local System, it too can access network resources while impersonating other users. A better practice is to configure services that use delegation to run under their own domain user accounts managed by domain administrators.</p>
<p>Ideas? I think I just need dig a little deeper into the windows security model and understand impersonation better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CG</title>
		<link>http://blog.c22.cc/2009/04/15/ms09-012-fixing-%e2%80%9ctoken-kidnapping%e2%80%9d/comment-page-1/#comment-195</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CG]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 15:38:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://c22blog.wordpress.com/?p=468#comment-195</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think its because the patch fixes the issue of going from a network service to SYSTEM via priv escalation.

incognito takes you from SYSTEM to another token.  

but that&#039;s just from reading the unclear advisories.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think its because the patch fixes the issue of going from a network service to SYSTEM via priv escalation.</p>
<p>incognito takes you from SYSTEM to another token.  </p>
<p>but that&#8217;s just from reading the unclear advisories.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

